• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!



This version was saved 17 years, 3 months ago View current version     Page history
Saved by PBworks
on August 29, 2006 at 2:44:22 am

Opposition to Deleting Online Predators Act


This page: A draft letter to a congress person. Scroll down.


This page contains the draft of a letter to a congress person in opposition to the Deleting Online Predators Act of 2006 (H. R. 5319). Read the letter below. You can edit the page using the password, "dopa".


" Filter a website and you protect a student for a day. Educate students about online safety in a real world environment and you protect your child for a lifetime. " Christopher Harris


Useful pages in this wiki



Useful pages Elsewhere


The SupportBlogging Wiki

The purpose of the Support Blogging Wiki is to provide materials for decision-makers as they determine policies for their schools and districts that would impact the use of educational blogging or potentially restrict access to sites that provide blogging services.


Here's the letter...edit away!


Don't know who your Rep is? You can contact them by going here. (You'll need your zip code with the four-digit extension. If you don't know the 4-digit extension, you can find it at this site).



Dear Representative ,


I am writing today to voice my strong dissent to a bill pending introduction by Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (R-PA) titled the “Deleting Online Predators Act” or DOPA. This particular bill is not only ill-conceived; it is a blatant attempt to mine political capital from the recent negative media coverage of social networking Web sites like MySpace.com.


Under the current version of the bill, any “commercial Web sites that let users create public ‘Web pages or profiles’ and also offer a discussion board, chat room, or e-mail service” would be made inaccessible to underage students in schools. In essence, this would mean that countless millions of Webpages would be restricted, the vast majority of which contain legitimate, potentially useful content for the classroom. It also means that those resources would be in effect excluded from use by teachers who might otherwise choose to include them in their lessons.


No doubt, many of our children who connect with their peers or friends using social networking sites, chat rooms, Weblogs and other Web tools put themselves at risk by publishing personal information or provocative pictures of themselves. It’s a dangerous practice, one that has a long-term impact as a part of an “online portfolio” that many do not even realize they are building. Banning these sites from schools, however, does nothing to ameliorate these dangers; in fact, it could have the opposite effect as students may see them as “forbidden fruit” to be accessed only when not in the company of an adult. What happens when the child leaves school and goes online at home or at a friend’s house? Without having been taught techniques for safe web interactions, that child will be at greater risk.


Think of the predators that children encounter at the mall, in churches, and (it shames me to say it) in our schools - should we ban access to those places as well, or would it be better to teach students how to act in a safe manner and recognize predatory behavior?


As the Web becomes more and more a part of the way that kids communicate and socialize, I would submit that we need to focus on educating them in the most effective and safe ways to use these technologies. Banning them is a reactionary response, not a reasoned one. And it is a response whose ultimate motives are spurious at best. Why not, instead, focus our discussions on how best to prepare the millions of new teachers who will be entering the classroom in the next five years to deal with these issues, or on reaching out to parents to make sure they are well versed in overseeing their children’s use of the Internet?


We are faced with teaching children how to be effective citizens in a global economy. In this economy, they must be able to collaborate with people around the world through the use of software programs such as those you are considering banning. It is essential that students become effective global citizens while they are still in school as they participate in online science projects, history projects, writing workshops, and more through the use of tools such as blogs and wikis.


Mr. Holt, the “genie is out of the bottle” in terms of these technologies, and no legislation short of complete regulation of the Internet is going to protect our children from the potential harm. Instead of “deleting online predators,’ this bill will simply delete our ability to effectively prepare our students for a life that will more and more be intertwined with the Web.






Here's another alternative letter tool and code, created by several edubloggers, click on "Edit Page and copy the code into your blog:


DOPA: Track the bill and take action!

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.